Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:47
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ryan Lochte’s wife Kayla reveals ‘painful’ divorce after seven years of marriage - New York Post
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why does the USA continue to be the driver of the world economy?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
iOS 26 Includes These Five Smaller Features You Might Have Missed - MacRumors
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Obesity Newcomer Metsera, Up 23%, Enters The Ring With A Punch - Investor's Business Daily
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How can I control my daily masturbating habit?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.